The Commentator
Volume 63 Issue 1
![[HOME]](/images/b_home.jpg)
![[NEWS]](/images/b_news.jpg)
![[FEATURES]](/images/b_features.jpg)
![[EDITORIALS]](/images/b_ed.jpg)
![[LETTERS]](/images/b_letters.jpg)
![[COLUMNS]](/images/b_columns.jpg)
![[ENTERTAINMENT]](/images/b_enter.jpg)
![[SPORTS]](/images/b_sports.jpg)
![[ABOUT]](/images/b_about.jpg)
![[STAFF]](/images/b_staff.jpg)
![[ARCHIVES]](/images/b_archives.jpg)
| |
Sruli Speaks
Fellow Students,
My four years have passed in the blink of an eye. When I arrived at
Yeshiva University, I admittedly did not know what to expect. I had my
own preconceived notions as to what college life would be like,
especially in Yeshiva University. I didn't have
an older brother to tell me how it "was" in YU, but I quickly learned
about our school and its "system". Many students were simply going
through the motions and accepted our school for what it was, while
others believed in the potential of Yeshiva University. Change is not a one shot deal, but rather an
ongoing process, which must be continued and nurtured over the course of many years. As
student leaders we try to make immediate improvements to the quality of
life on campus; very often we are successful and everybody sees
immediate rewards. Other times it takes the
cooperative effort of students and administration over several years to
see the fruits of their labor.
I like to view Yeshiva University as a work in progress. The core
problems that plague our campus all have a common denominator - the
University does not listen to its students. It seems that the very
tenants for whom the University is providing an ed
ucation and room and board have little input into what happens on
campus. YU has grown by leaps and bounds, but as a result it has lost
track of its raison d'etre - the students coming to its campuses
to learn. A prime example of ignoring student
input is apparent in the case of the recent dormitory lounge
renovations. While we are grateful for these improvements, which are no
doubt done with our benefit in mind, the school did not solicit student
opinion. If the administration was planning to spend close to $25,000
dollars for new lounge furniture, logic would
dictate that an important step in this plan would be to speak to the
very students who use the lounges. This it seems, is not the "YU
Way."
When we express our concerns about the lack of student representation
the responses are always filled with excuses and promises to change
things in the future. The problem arises when the same practice is
continued the following year. The student voice once again goes
unheard, because, after all, didn't the Administration just spend
$25,000 for the students!?! A prime example of administrative apathy can
be found each and every year when it comes to planning for orientation.
Each year, student leaders request to be included in Orientation
planning and scheduling from the initial stages, and each year they are
promised this will occur the following year. Sure enough our leaders are
brought into the fold only after the majority of planning is completed.
But, of course, there are times when the University does search out
the opinions of the students. Unfortunately, this always happens when
students are backed into a corner and have no choice but to tell the
administration what they want to hear. Then
the Administration has its ammo, retorting, "but the student leaders
agreed to it!!!" It seems that they only seek out our opinions for the
sake of public relations.
A recent example is the situation regarding the BMP Beis Midrash
renovation; only after the decision to relocate to Schottenstein were
student leaders informed, as an apparent courtesy.
A discussion of this topic would not be complete without mentioning
graduation. Graduation should be a moment of joy and happiness for
countless seniors who have worked hard to attain this goal. To the
University it is simply an opportunity to give honor to its many
contributors and benefactors. At the mere mention of a
desire to have more student involvement in Commencement, smiles break
out on the face of the many administrators. "It is an issue of time" we
are told, "after all, the program is long enough as is and the graduates
would get upset if it was any longer." There is however, more than
enough time for numerous "Doctorates of Humane Letters" to be given out
to benefactors of the University. Enough of the University patting
itself on the back; they have the Chanukah Dinner to do that. How about
showing a little respect for the students who have put in long hours,
hard work and paid their tuition?
I would be remiss if I did not point out that segments of the
Administration have been making great strides in improving student life.
The Office of Student Services has changed for the better in the time
that I have been here. Their belief that "the students are the
customers" has brought about many positive changes. But it is not
enough. The University must adopt this policy in all of its
departments.
In closing, it has been a long year filled with memorable events.
Nothing this year would have been possible without the hard work of
numerous students. For fear of leaving somebody out, I will not list
any names, but you know who you are and I would
like to thank you for making this year as great as it was.
Sruli Tannenbaum
YCSC President 1997-98
|