|
by Avi Mermelstein What kind of column begins this way?
One that was written months ago, when beginning a column, “Until I
started this sentence” didn’t seem so restrictive.
However, now that I want to put this advisory at the top, I realize that
doing so robs the original opening sentence of its meaning, which in turn
threatens to undermine the entire original opening paragraph predicated upon
that sentence. So, all in all, I
feel a lot safer telling you now that there are a few things you should now up
front, or, in this case, in the middle. For
example, you should probably know (by my telling you) that I’m not going to
welcome you back from your vacations. So
don’t sit around waiting. In
fact, I advise you not to waste your valuable time (already wasted on the rest
of this newspaper) combing through this column for any nice sentiments such as
“I hope you had a great summer,” or “I hope you’re refreshed and ready
to meet the challenges of the upcoming school year.”
Don’t expect to find even the familiar and reassuring if less upbeat
lines such as “Another summer has come to an end all-too-soon,” or “Here
we go again, back to the old grind.” Above
all, don’t expect me to explain myself. If
you read the rest of my columns, their intricate internal logic should become
abundantly clear—though not necessarily to you.
On that note, I will begin for the third time, this time with an
anecdote… The other day, I had the unfortunate experience of
rereading some of my past writing and liking it.
This doesn’t happen as frequently as you might think, especially if you
knew me to be the narcissistic writer that you must know me to be by then end of
this sentence. (Only a narcissist
would use “narcissistic” in a sentence instead of “pompous,”
“pretentious,” “conceited,” “self-congratulatory,” or
“egocentric” and only a writer would use a word that is impossible to
casually say out loud—try it.) In
fact, I usually have a negative physical reaction (thankfully confined to
wincing) when confronted with something I wrote.
I think that this reaction stems from the similarity between my writing
process—my mind is in agony before, active during, and blank after my
writing—and purging. Thus,
reviewing my own writing is akin to reingesting (the spell-check recommends
reinvesting) my own vomit. However, this time, as I reread some of my old high-school
columns, I found myself impressed by my brilliant wit that punctuated my flowing
stream-of-consciousness style. Man
was I good! I realized that I was
going to be a tough act to follow. I
began to doubt whether I could ever attain the pinnacle of performance, the acme
of achievement, the zenith of uh…zithers, zoo, zamboni, Zen-Buddhism,
xylophone, Xanadu, Zoroastrianism…yes! Zenith of Zoroastrianism!
Right, the zenith of Zoroastrianism that I had once (zither looks a lot
better now) reached (lamely). Of course, even if I were able to write as well as in
high-school, I would still be writing self-consciously, which, while advanced
for high-school seems par for the course at YU. So, excepting novelty of style, what had I to offer my
audience? Certainly not substance. That, gentle reader, explains why I was extracting hard-won
knowledge from the baleful basilisk stare of a blank screen.
Did you know that you can only get one Tip of the Day?
Considering that it’s only 12:57 in the morning, it’s going to be a
while before I learn anything besides how to undo or redo several actions at a
time (accomplished clicking the arrow next to the undo or redo button).
-And so I leave you with nothing. What do you think? Click here to send a letter to the editors. All content is copyright © Yeshiva University Commentator. | |||||